Table 3. Results of structural model and hypothesis testing
Hypotheses and path | Path coefficient | p-value | Test result |
H1a | ENT → BAW | 0.211 | < .001 | Supported |
H1b | INT → BAW | 0.274 | < .001 | Supported |
H1c | CUS → BAW | 0.193 | < .001 | Supported |
H1d | TRE → BAW | 0.071 | 0.147 | Rejected |
H1e | INF → BAW | 0.157 | 0.003 | Supported |
H2a | ENT → BIM | 0.188 | 0.004 | Supported |
H2b | INT → BIM | 0.287 | < .001 | Supported |
H2c | CUS → BIM | 0.281 | < .001 | Supported |
H2d | TRE → BIM | –0.094 | 0.147 | Rejected |
H2e | INF → BIM | 0.105 | 0.095 | Supported |
H3 | BAW → BAT | 0.316 | < .001 | Supported |
H4 | BIM → BAT | 0.570 | < .001 | Supported |
H5 | BAT → WOM | 0.751 | < .001 | Supported |
H6 | BAT → PU | 0.753 | < .001 | Supported |
Note. ENT, entertainment; INT, interaction; CUS, customization; TRE, trendiness; INF, informativity; BAW, brand awareness; BIM, brand image; BAT, brand attitude; WOM, word of mouth; PU, purchase.